>Stable or maximum growth?

>

Most economists and politicians argue for growth to be treated as the primary goal. Practically all people agree that growth is desirable. But what sort of growth should it be? Assuming we will always have economic slumps, should we try and stabilise growth so that we don’t suffer huge depressions, or should we just aim to achieve the highest possible rate of growth over a hundred year period?

2 comments

  • >Sorry for the graph. I know it sucks.

  • >There are huge problems with stabilisation policies, but in theory I have to stand with a stable model of progression. Happiness is relative. If we are continually losing what we worked so hard to gain in the previous years then we will not be happy, irelevent of the level of economic productivity that exists when we become grandparents.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s