>Should you obey laws if you think they’re wrong or immoral?
>This question was pondered by pretty much every great philosopher: Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Hobbes, the list continues.
>This question was pondered by pretty much every great philosopher: Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Hobbes, the list continues.
>Many people were worried when right wing Netanyahu was elected Prime Minister. Those worries have been confirmed for many people with his refusal to stop the illegal expansion of Israeli settlements onto Palestinian territory, and now what can only be called persecution of the 15% non Jews within Israel, whereby children born and educated in Israel are being forcefully exported due to their non-Jewish roots, and Palestinian slums bordering on territories claimed by Israel are being demolished. Israel is now being accused of “cultural genocide” after the Israeli government claimed a sacred tomb in the West Bank that is valued by Jews and Muslims alike.
But can we play the blame game in the Middle East? How can we solve the problems? Is it even possible to bring peace?
>Pascal’s Wager says that we should believe in God not because He exists but because the best possible outcome can be obtained by believing.
Let’s assume that we could just believe what we chose to believe. Was Pascal right? Do we lead better lives with religion? Or can we lead better lives without?
>This is a discussion aimed to help people learn rather than a debate. So if you have any questions about this topic put them forward and hopefully someone will answer them correctly.
>If a group of historians from the future gave you the chance to name the age we’re living in today what would you say and why?
>Should they be taking them or not?
>The concept of equality has changed over time. At first it would have been all members of a group, then a class and sex, then a sex and colour etc. Did you know that some of the first advocates of communism said women were possessions and should therefore be shared like everything else?
So what does equality mean to you today? Does it mean all people being completely equal in rights etc? Or do you think animals should be treated equally too? Maybe you’d go the opposite way and perhaps say that people should not be considered equal?
>Milton Friedman (a famous American economist) once advocated a privatized system of education where every new born child receives a certain number of vouchers that can be redeemed at any educational institution right up till PHD level. This would give parents a choice of whether to spend all the vouchers getting their child into a world class school like Eton, or spending the vouchers getting their children into a moderate school but still having some vouchers left over to fund higher education. Though of course parents would be able to spend extra money on top of the vouchers.
Is this a good idea or should education be solely administered by the state?
Any other ideas for educational reform are also welcome (from any country).
>It is fashionable among modern politicians to say that the environment is the biggest problem facing our age. But many environmentalists argue that the planet is overpopulated. In fact one the most popular documentaries to ever be made, ‘Planet Earth’, features a quote saying that we need to limit the number of people to a level far below its current 6 billion in order to achieve a sustainable level of life.
Then there are all the abusive, and just plain bad parents out there. What gives them the right to be a parent? Is a child always better off with the natural parents?
>Causes of conflict:
Many people in the west are calling out for governments to put pressure on China to reform, particularly in the sphere of human rights and currency issues.
But are these people right that the West should attempt to ‘manage’ China while it still has the chance? Or should we be more cautious? And what do you think will happen? Will tensions escalate?